Skip to content
Compare Marseille vs Lausanne

Marseille vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Marseille Home Team
Lausanne Lausanne Away Team
Marseille
45.3
W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

7

Marseille

5

Draw

3

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Marseille
Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Greenwood (3 goals)
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

1
Marseille
Lausanne
Marseille

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0
Defense 58.8
Form 41.5
Consistency 44.8
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Marseille logo Marseille
W
Le Havre (58%)
L
Nantes (56%)
D
Nice (55%)
L
Lorient (69%)
W
Metz (43%)
L
Monaco (77%)
L
Lille (73%)
W
Auxerre (66%)
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Le Havre A
1 - 0 W
58%
Nantes A
0 - 3 L
56%
Nice H
1 - 1 D
55%
Lorient A
0 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 1 W
43%
Monaco A
1 - 2 L
77%
Lille H
1 - 2 L
73%
Auxerre H
1 - 0 W
66%
Toulouse A
1 - 0 W
62%
Toulouse H
2 - 2 D
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Marseille has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.7) compared to Lausanne (SoS: 36.8). This means Marseille's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Marseille averaging 1.1 and Lausanne averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Marseille has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Lausanne's 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Marseille has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Marseille

VS
Lausanne

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more