Compare Marseille vs Lens

Marseille vs Lens Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Lens: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Home Team

Lens Away Team

Marseille

45.3

W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Lens

58.8

W D D W W L W L W D

Categories Won

Marseille

Draw

Lens

Performance Radar

Marseille

Lens

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Greenwood (3 goals)

F. Thauvin (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

100%

5W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating

45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Marseille

Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 58.8

Form 41.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2

Defense 50.4

Form 50.4

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 77.8

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 56.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Marseille

Lens

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

58%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

56%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

43%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

77%

Lille H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

73%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

66%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

62%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

51%

Nice A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

60%

Brest A

French Ligue 1

3 - 3 D

61%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

4 - 1 W

40%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 2 W

57%

Lille A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

78%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

5 - 1 W

47%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 0 W

43%

Lyon A

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

54%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.7 vs 50.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Lens's attack is on another level, averaging 2.3 goals per match with F. Thauvin leading the charge with 5 goals. Marseille manages just 1.1 per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Marseille conceding 1.3 and Lens conceding 1.5 per match.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Lens has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Lens

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair