Compare Marseille vs NEC

Marseille vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Home Team

NEC Away Team

Marseille

45.3

W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

NEC

56.6

L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

Marseille

Draw

NEC

Performance Radar

Marseille

NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Greenwood (3 goals)

B. Linssen (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating

45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Marseille

NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 58.8

Form 41.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6

Defense 66.6

Form 35.2

Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%

Marseille

NEC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

58%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

56%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

43%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

77%

Lille H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

73%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

66%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

62%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

66%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

64%

Twente A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

81%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Excelsior A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

60%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

67%

PSV A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

80%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

49%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 3 L

56%

Ajax A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Marseille (SoS: 53.7). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Marseille's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Marseille conceding 1.3 and NEC conceding 1.3 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair