Skip to content
Compare Marseille vs Slaven

Marseille vs Slaven Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Slaven: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Marseille Home Team
Slaven Slaven Away Team
Marseille
45.3
W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Slaven
31.9
W L D L D L L D L D

Categories Won

9

Marseille

3

Draw

3

Slaven

Performance Radar

Marseille
Slaven

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Greenwood (3 goals)
M. Dabro (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

35.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

1.04

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

31.9

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 31.2, Form: 8.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1

31-45'

5
3

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

1
Marseille
Slaven
Marseille

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0
Defense 58.8
Form 41.5
Consistency 44.8
Slaven

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 31.2
Form 8.5
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Marseille logo Marseille
W
Le Havre (58%)
L
Nantes (56%)
D
Nice (55%)
L
Lorient (69%)
W
Metz (43%)
L
Monaco (77%)
L
Lille (73%)
W
Auxerre (66%)
Slaven logo Slaven
W
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)
D
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
D
Hajduk (53%)
L
Varaždin (54%)
L
Rijeka (44%)
D
Osijek (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Le Havre A
1 - 0 W
58%
Nantes A
0 - 3 L
56%
Nice H
1 - 1 D
55%
Lorient A
0 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 1 W
43%
Monaco A
1 - 2 L
77%
Lille H
1 - 2 L
73%
Auxerre H
1 - 0 W
66%
Toulouse A
1 - 0 W
62%
Toulouse H
2 - 2 D
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
1 - 3 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 2 D
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
2 - 2 D
53%
Varaždin A
1 - 2 L
54%
Rijeka H
0 - 2 L
44%
Osijek H
0 - 0 D
40%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 4 L
76%
Gorica A
2 - 2 D
50%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Marseille has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.7) compared to Slaven (SoS: 35.1). This means Marseille's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Marseille averaging 1.1 and Slaven averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Marseille has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Slaven's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Marseille has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Marseille

VS
Slaven

Slaven

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more