Skip to content
Compare Marseille vs Liberec

Marseille vs Liberec Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Liberec: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Marseille Home Team
Liberec Liberec Away Team
Marseille
45.3
W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Liberec
35.3
L L W D L W D D L L

Categories Won

10

Marseille

4

Draw

1

Liberec

Performance Radar

Marseille
Liberec

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Greenwood (3 goals)
R. Krollis (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

43.4

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 57.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

0.75

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

35.3

Attack: 21.8, Defense: 56.0, Form: 18.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

1
Marseille
Liberec
Marseille

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0
Defense 58.8
Form 41.5
Consistency 44.8
Liberec

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 21.8
Defense 56.0
Form 18.7
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 57.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Marseille logo Marseille
W
Le Havre (58%)
L
Nantes (56%)
D
Nice (55%)
L
Lorient (69%)
W
Metz (43%)
L
Monaco (77%)
L
Lille (73%)
W
Auxerre (66%)
Liberec logo Liberec
L
Plzeň (64%)
L
Slavia Prague (69%)
W
Jablonec (49%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (61%)
L
Karviná (48%)
W
Slovácko (45%)
D
Teplice (49%)
D
Bohemians (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Le Havre A
1 - 0 W
58%
Nantes A
0 - 3 L
56%
Nice H
1 - 1 D
55%
Lorient A
0 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 1 W
43%
Monaco A
1 - 2 L
77%
Lille H
1 - 2 L
73%
Auxerre H
1 - 0 W
66%
Toulouse A
1 - 0 W
62%
Toulouse H
2 - 2 D
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Plzeň A
0 - 2 L
64%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 2 L
69%
Jablonec A
2 - 1 W
49%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 0 D
61%
Karviná A
1 - 3 L
48%
Slovácko H
2 - 1 W
45%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
49%
Bohemians A
0 - 0 D
58%
Hradec Kr. H
0 - 1 L
59%
Slavia Prague A
0 - 1 L
74%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Marseille has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.7) compared to Liberec (SoS: 43.4). This means Marseille's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Marseille holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus Liberec's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Marseille conceding 1.3 and Liberec conceding 1.2 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Marseille has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Marseille

VS
Liberec

Liberec

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more