Skip to content
Compare Metz vs Anderlecht

Metz vs Anderlecht Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Metz vs Anderlecht: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Metz Metz Home Team
Anderlecht Anderlecht Away Team
Metz
30.1
L L D L L D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Anderlecht
34.9
D L L L W W L L L D

Categories Won

2

Metz

3

Draw

10

Anderlecht

Performance Radar

Metz
Anderlecht

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 3D, 7L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-14

-14

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)
M. Cvetković (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.2

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

44.5

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 59.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

1.41

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
30.1

Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0

34.9

Attack: 44.1, Defense: 28.4, Form: 18.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

2

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

6
Metz
Anderlecht
Metz

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 35.7
Defense 21.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7
Anderlecht

Power Rating Breakdown

34.9

Overall

Attack 44.1
Defense 28.4
Form 18.9
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 59.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Metz logo Metz
L
Lorient (64%)
L
Monaco (72%)
D
Le Havre (58%)
L
Paris FC (72%)
L
Marseille (66%)
D
Nantes (51%)
D
Rennes (80%)
L
Toulouse (57%)
Anderlecht logo Anderlecht
D
Gent (51%)
L
Club Brugge (66%)
L
R. Union SG (64%)
L
Sint-Truiden (49%)
W
Mechelen (34%)
W
Gent (58%)
L
Club Brugge (83%)
L
Cercle Brugge (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lorient H
0 - 4 L
64%
Monaco H
1 - 2 L
72%
Le Havre A
4 - 4 D
58%
Paris FC H
1 - 3 L
72%
Marseille A
1 - 3 L
66%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
51%
Rennes A
0 - 0 D
80%
Toulouse H
3 - 4 L
57%
Lens A
0 - 3 L
76%
Brest H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gent A
1 - 1 D
51%
Club Brugge H
1 - 3 L
66%
R. Union SG H
1 - 3 L
64%
Sint-Truiden A
0 - 2 L
49%
Mechelen A
2 - 1 W
34%
Gent H
3 - 1 W
58%
Club Brugge A
2 - 4 L
83%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 3 L
58%
Mechelen A
0 - 1 L
45%
Club Brugge A
2 - 2 D
83%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Metz has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.2) compared to Anderlecht (SoS: 44.5). This means Metz's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Anderlecht holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Metz's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Metz conceding 2.4 and Anderlecht conceding 2.1 per match.

Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Metz

Metz

VS
Anderlecht

Anderlecht

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more