Compare Metz vs Angers

Metz vs Angers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Metz vs Angers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Metz Home Team

Angers Away Team

Metz

30.1

L L D L L D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Angers

30.8

D L L D L D L L W L

Categories Won

Metz

Draw

Angers

Performance Radar

Metz

Angers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

0W, 3D, 7L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-14

-13

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)

P. Peter (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5

1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

0W / 6 matches

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

57.2

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

57.7

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 66.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 4 matches

0W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

0.6

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating

30.1

Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0

30.8

Attack: 21.5, Defense: 39.5, Form: 10.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Metz

Angers

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 35.7

Defense 21.4

Form 0.0

Consistency 93.7

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 21.5

Defense 39.5

Form 10.8

Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 66.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Metz

Angers

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lorient H

French Ligue 1

0 - 4 L

64%

Monaco H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

72%

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

4 - 4 D

58%

Paris FC H

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

72%

Marseille A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

66%

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

51%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

80%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 4 L

57%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

76%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

56%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Strasbourg H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Auxerre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

71%

Paris SG H

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

79%

Le Havre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

53%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

80%

Lyon H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

65%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

1 - 5 L

76%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

55%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

56%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

77%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.2 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Metz holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus Angers's 0.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Angers has the defensive edge, conceding 1.9 per match compared to Metz's 2.4.

Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Angers has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Metz

Angers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair