Metz vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Metz vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Metz
Home Team
Cremonese
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Metz
Draw
Cremonese
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
0W, 3D, 7L
2W, 1D, 7L
10 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
24 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
-14
-8
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
0W / 6 matches
1W / 6 matches
0W / 4 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2
League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0
0W / 4 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22
Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0
Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Metz
Cremonese
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.2 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Metz averaging 1.0 and Cremonese averaging 0.9 goals per match.
Cremonese has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to Metz's 2.4.
Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
Cremonese has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Metz
Cremonese
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams