Compare Metz vs Genk

Metz vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Metz vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Metz Home Team

Genk Away Team

Metz

30.1

L L D L L D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

Metz

Draw

Genk

Performance Radar

Metz

Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

0W, 3D, 7L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-14

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)

A. Bibout (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

0W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

57.2

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 4 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

30.1

Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Metz

Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 35.7

Defense 21.4

Form 0.0

Consistency 93.7

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Metz

Genk

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lorient H

French Ligue 1

0 - 4 L

64%

Monaco H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

72%

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

4 - 4 D

58%

Paris FC H

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

72%

Marseille A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

66%

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

51%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

80%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 4 L

57%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

76%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

56%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.2 vs 56.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Metz's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Genk has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Metz's 2.4.

Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Genk emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (50.6 vs 30.1) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Metz

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair