Skip to content
Compare Metz vs SK Poltava

Metz vs SK Poltava Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Metz vs SK Poltava: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Metz Metz Home Team
SK Poltava SK Poltava Away Team
Metz
30.1
L L D L L D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

SK Poltava
23.0
L D L D L D L L L L

Categories Won

8

Metz

6

Draw

1

SK Poltava

Performance Radar

Metz
SK Poltava

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 3D, 7L

0%

0W, 3D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

2.9

29 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-14

-14

-22

-22

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)
V. Sad (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.2

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

64.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

0.94

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
30.1

Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0

23.0

Attack: 26.6, Defense: 3.8, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

Metz
SK Poltava
Metz

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 35.7
Defense 21.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7
SK Poltava

Power Rating Breakdown

23.0

Overall

Attack 26.6
Defense 3.8
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 71.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Metz logo Metz
L
Lorient (64%)
L
Monaco (72%)
D
Le Havre (58%)
L
Paris FC (72%)
L
Marseille (66%)
D
Nantes (51%)
D
Rennes (80%)
L
Toulouse (57%)
SK Poltava logo SK Poltava
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
D
Kryvbas KR (71%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Obolon (63%)
L
Polissya (77%)
D
Oleksandria (44%)
L
Metalist 1925 (79%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (81%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lorient H
0 - 4 L
64%
Monaco H
1 - 2 L
72%
Le Havre A
4 - 4 D
58%
Paris FC H
1 - 3 L
72%
Marseille A
1 - 3 L
66%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
51%
Rennes A
0 - 0 D
80%
Toulouse H
3 - 4 L
57%
Lens A
0 - 3 L
76%
Brest H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shakhtar D H
0 - 4 L
78%
Kryvbas KR H
3 - 3 D
71%
Kolos A
0 - 2 L
83%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
63%
Polissya H
0 - 4 L
77%
Oleksandria H
3 - 3 D
44%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 2 L
79%
Karpaty Lviv H
0 - 4 L
81%
Zorya A
0 - 4 L
80%
Kudrivka H
0 - 2 L
55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.2 vs 64.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Metz holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus SK Poltava's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Metz has the defensive edge, conceding 2.4 per match compared to SK Poltava's 2.9.

Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

SK Poltava has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Metz has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Metz

Metz

VS
SK Poltava

SK Poltava

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more