Skip to content
Compare Midtjylland vs Brann

Midtjylland vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Midtjylland vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Midtjylland Midtjylland Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
Midtjylland
43.7
D D D W W W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

5

Midtjylland

4

Draw

6

Brann

Performance Radar

Midtjylland
Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Erlić (2 goals)
K. Ingason (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.36

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.06

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
43.7

Attack: 40.1, Defense: 55.6, Form: 27.8

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

5
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

4
Midtjylland
Brann
Midtjylland

Power Rating Breakdown

43.7

Overall

Attack 40.1
Defense 55.6
Form 27.8
Consistency 62.8
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Midtjylland logo Midtjylland
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
D
Viborg (50%)
D
AGF (62%)
W
Sønderjyske (48%)
W
AGF (57%)
W
Brøndby (49%)
D
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Viborg (55%)
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nordsjælland A
0 - 0 D
60%
Viborg H
3 - 3 D
50%
AGF A
0 - 0 D
62%
Sønderjyske A
2 - 1 W
48%
AGF H
2 - 1 W
57%
Brøndby A
2 - 1 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 2 D
43%
Viborg A
1 - 1 D
55%
Nottm Forest H
1 - 2 L
76%
Nordsjælland H
0 - 1 L
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.6 vs 42.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Midtjylland's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Midtjylland conceding 1.2 and Brann conceding 1.4 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Midtjylland

Midtjylland

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more