Compare Midtjylland vs NAC

Midtjylland vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Midtjylland vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Midtjylland Home Team

NAC Away Team

Midtjylland

43.7

D D D W W W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

NAC

33.2

W L L D D L L D L W

Categories Won

Midtjylland

Draw

NAC

Performance Radar

Midtjylland

NAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-11

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Erlić (2 goals)

M. Nassoh (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

42.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.36

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.06

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

Adjusted Power Rating

43.7

Attack: 40.1, Defense: 55.6, Form: 27.8

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Midtjylland

NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

43.7

Overall

Attack 40.1

Defense 55.6

Form 27.8

Consistency 62.8

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7

Defense 38.1

Form 20.8

Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 62.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Midtjylland

NAC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

60%

Viborg H

Danish Superligaen

3 - 3 D

50%

AGF A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

62%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

48%

AGF H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

57%

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

49%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

43%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Nottm Forest H

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

76%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 1 L

55%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

67%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

Ajax H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

62%

Fortuna A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

61%

Sparta H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

44%

Zwolle A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

59%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 6 L

70%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 3 D

67%

Telstar A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

69%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NAC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.8) compared to Midtjylland (SoS: 42.6). This means NAC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Midtjylland holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Midtjylland has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Midtjylland has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Midtjylland

NAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair