Skip to content
Compare Midtjylland vs Olympiakos

Midtjylland vs Olympiakos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Midtjylland vs Olympiakos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Midtjylland Midtjylland Home Team
Olympiakos Olympiakos Away Team
Midtjylland
43.7
D D D W W W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Olympiakos
48.6
D L W L D W D W D W

Categories Won

4

Midtjylland

3

Draw

8

Olympiakos

Performance Radar

Midtjylland
Olympiakos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Erlić (2 goals)
A. El Kaabi (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

43.3

League Difficulty: 60.1, Opponent Quality: 55.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.36

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.06

1.11

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
43.7

Attack: 40.1, Defense: 55.6, Form: 27.8

48.6

Attack: 34.2, Defense: 74.6, Form: 37.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

2
Midtjylland
Olympiakos
Midtjylland

Power Rating Breakdown

43.7

Overall

Attack 40.1
Defense 55.6
Form 27.8
Consistency 62.8
Olympiakos

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 34.2
Defense 74.6
Form 37.3
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 60.1

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 55.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Midtjylland logo Midtjylland
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
D
Viborg (50%)
D
AGF (62%)
W
Sønderjyske (48%)
W
AGF (57%)
W
Brøndby (49%)
D
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Viborg (55%)
Olympiakos logo Olympiakos
D
PAOK (54%)
L
PAOK (59%)
W
Panathinaikos (57%)
L
AEK Athens (62%)
D
Larissa (41%)
W
OFI (49%)
D
PAOK (54%)
W
Panserraikos (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nordsjælland A
0 - 0 D
60%
Viborg H
3 - 3 D
50%
AGF A
0 - 0 D
62%
Sønderjyske A
2 - 1 W
48%
AGF H
2 - 1 W
57%
Brøndby A
2 - 1 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 2 D
43%
Viborg A
1 - 1 D
55%
Nottm Forest H
1 - 2 L
76%
Nordsjælland H
0 - 1 L
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PAOK H
1 - 1 D
54%
PAOK A
1 - 3 L
59%
Panathinaikos A
2 - 0 W
57%
AEK Athens H
0 - 1 L
62%
Larissa H
0 - 0 D
41%
OFI A
3 - 0 W
49%
PAOK H
0 - 0 D
54%
Panserraikos A
2 - 1 W
54%
Leverkusen A
0 - 0 D
72%
Panaitolikos H
2 - 0 W
48%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.6 vs 43.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Midtjylland averaging 1.3 and Olympiakos averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Olympiakos has the defensive edge, conceding 0.6 per match compared to Midtjylland's 1.2.

Olympiakos is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Midtjylland

Midtjylland

VS
Olympiakos

Olympiakos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more