Compare Ml. Boleslav vs Genk

Ml. Boleslav vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Ml. Boleslav vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Ml. Boleslav Home Team

Genk Away Team

Ml. Boleslav

57.6

L D D W D D W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

Ml. Boleslav

Draw

Genk

Performance Radar

Ml. Boleslav

Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Ševčík (4 goals)

A. Bibout (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 12

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

51.4

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 47.0

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.62

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.08

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

57.6

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 74.4, Form: 40.6

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Ml. Boleslav

Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

57.6

Overall

Attack 57.5

Defense 74.4

Form 40.6

Consistency 63.7

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

47.0 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Ml. Boleslav

Genk

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Dukla H

Czech First League

1 - 2 L

46%

Zlín H

Czech First League

1 - 1 D

41%

Ostrava A

Czech First League

0 - 0 D

39%

Karviná A

Czech First League

3 - 0 W

48%

Liberec A

Czech First League

0 - 0 D

48%

Dukla H

Czech First League

1 - 1 D

46%

Olomouc A

Czech First League

4 - 2 W

51%

Pardubice H

Czech First League

2 - 0 W

57%

Slovácko A

Czech First League

2 - 2 D

50%

Jablonec H

Czech First League

3 - 0 W

44%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.4 vs 56.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Ml. Boleslav averaging 1.7 and Genk averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Defensively, Ml. Boleslav is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while Genk leaks 1.6 per match.

Ml. Boleslav has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Ml. Boleslav has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Ml. Boleslav

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair