Skip to content
Compare Mladost Lučani vs Brann

Mladost Lučani vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Mladost Lučani vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Mladost Lučani Mladost Lučani Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
Mladost Lučani
41.3
L W W D D W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

5

Mladost Lučani

3

Draw

7

Brann

Performance Radar

Mladost Lučani
Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Ćirić (5 goals)
K. Ingason (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.3

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.93

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.03

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
41.3

Attack: 30.5, Defense: 57.6, Form: 30.5

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

5
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

4
Mladost Lučani
Brann
Mladost Lučani

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 30.5
Defense 57.6
Form 30.5
Consistency 57.7
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

49.3 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Mladost Lučani logo Mladost Lučani
L
Radnički Niš (49%)
W
Spartak (28%)
W
TSC (60%)
D
Radnički Krag (52%)
D
FK IMT (63%)
W
Napredak (29%)
D
Radnički Krag (57%)
D
Partizan (52%)
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Radnički Niš A
0 - 1 L
49%
Spartak H
2 - 1 W
28%
TSC A
2 - 1 W
60%
Radnički Krag H
0 - 0 D
52%
FK IMT A
1 - 1 D
63%
Napredak H
2 - 0 W
29%
Radnički Krag A
1 - 1 D
57%
Partizan H
1 - 1 D
52%
Železničar P A
0 - 5 L
62%
Novi Pazar H
0 - 2 L
41%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.6 vs 42.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Mladost Lučani's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Mladost Lučani conceding 1.3 and Brann conceding 1.4 per match.

Mladost Lučani has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Mladost Lučani

Mladost Lučani

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more