Compare Monaco vs AGF

Monaco vs AGF Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Monaco vs AGF: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Monaco Home Team

AGF Away Team

Monaco

67.7

L W D D L W W W W W

Last 10 Matches

AGF

52.9

W W D D L D W D D W

Categories Won

Monaco

Draw

AGF

Performance Radar

Monaco

AGF

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

F. Balogun (8 goals)

T. Bech (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 13

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

69.4

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.4

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

50%

2W / 4 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.08

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.28

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating

67.7

Attack: 71.6, Defense: 67.7, Form: 71.6

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Monaco

AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

67.7

Overall

Attack 71.6

Defense 67.7

Form 71.6

Consistency 52.0

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0

Defense 75.1

Form 41.0

Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

64.4 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%

Monaco

AGF

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lille H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

73%

Metz A

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

48%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

2 - 2 D

62%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

2 - 2 D

66%

Paris FC A

French Ligue 1

1 - 4 L

77%

Marseille H

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

61%

Lyon A

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

70%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

2 - 0 W

56%

Paris SG A

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

84%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

2 - 0 W

47%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 0 W

49%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

43%

Midtjylland H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

52%

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

60%

Midtjylland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

57%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

55%

Brøndby H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

44%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

48%

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Monaco has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 69.4) compared to AGF (SoS: 52.4). This means Monaco's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Monaco holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus AGF's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Monaco's 1.3.

Monaco has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Monaco is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Monaco has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Monaco

AGF

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair