Skip to content
Compare Monaco vs Kryvbas KR

Monaco vs Kryvbas KR Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Monaco vs Kryvbas KR: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Monaco Monaco Home Team
Kryvbas KR Kryvbas KR Away Team
Monaco
67.7
L W D D L W W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Kryvbas KR
61.9
W W D L W W L W L D

Categories Won

8

Monaco

3

Draw

4

Kryvbas KR

Performance Radar

Monaco
Kryvbas KR

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Balogun (8 goals)
G. Mendoza (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
69.4

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.4

72.8

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 67.3

Elite Opponent Record
50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.08

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.28

2.78

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.88

Adjusted Power Rating
67.7

Attack: 71.6, Defense: 67.7, Form: 71.6

61.9

Attack: 77.8, Defense: 53.2, Form: 61.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

4
5

46-60'

3
6

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

2
Monaco
Kryvbas KR
Monaco

Power Rating Breakdown

67.7

Overall

Attack 71.6
Defense 67.7
Form 71.6
Consistency 52.0
Kryvbas KR

Power Rating Breakdown

61.9

Overall

Attack 77.8
Defense 53.2
Form 61.4
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

64.4 vs 67.3

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 40%
Monaco logo Monaco
L
Lille (73%)
W
Metz (48%)
D
Toulouse (62%)
D
Auxerre (66%)
L
Paris FC (77%)
W
Marseille (61%)
W
Lyon (70%)
W
Brest (56%)
Kryvbas KR logo Kryvbas KR
W
Veres Rivne (67%)
W
Karpaty Lviv (81%)
D
SK Poltava (50%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (44%)
W
Kudrivka (60%)
L
LNZ Cherkasy (74%)
W
Epitsentr (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lille H
0 - 1 L
73%
Metz A
2 - 1 W
48%
Toulouse A
2 - 2 D
62%
Auxerre H
2 - 2 D
66%
Paris FC A
1 - 4 L
77%
Marseille H
2 - 1 W
61%
Lyon A
2 - 1 W
70%
Brest H
2 - 0 W
56%
Paris SG A
3 - 1 W
84%
Angers H
2 - 0 W
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Veres Rivne A
3 - 1 W
67%
Karpaty Lviv H
1 - 0 W
81%
SK Poltava A
3 - 3 D
50%
Dynamo Kyiv H
5 - 6 L
78%
Rukh Vynnyky H
3 - 0 W
44%
Kudrivka A
2 - 1 W
60%
LNZ Cherkasy H
0 - 3 L
74%
Epitsentr H
2 - 1 W
74%
Polissya A
0 - 2 L
82%
Obolon A
0 - 0 D
63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 69.4 vs 72.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Monaco averaging 1.8 and Kryvbas KR averaging 1.9 goals per match.

Monaco has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Kryvbas KR's 1.7.

Monaco has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Kryvbas KR has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Monaco is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Monaco has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Monaco

Monaco

VS
Kryvbas KR

Kryvbas KR

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more