Compare NAC vs Angers

NAC vs Angers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Angers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC Home Team

Angers Away Team

NAC

33.2

W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Angers

30.8

D L L D L D L L W L

Categories Won

NAC

Draw

Angers

Performance Radar

NAC

Angers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-11

-13

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Nassoh (2 goals)

P. Peter (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

57.7

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 66.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

0.6

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

30.8

Attack: 21.5, Defense: 39.5, Form: 10.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

NAC

Angers

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7

Defense 38.1

Form 20.8

Consistency 61.3

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 21.5

Defense 39.5

Form 10.8

Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 66.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

NAC

Angers

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

67%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

Ajax H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

62%

Fortuna A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

61%

Sparta H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

44%

Zwolle A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

59%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 6 L

70%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 3 D

67%

Telstar A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

69%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

49%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Strasbourg H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Auxerre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

71%

Paris SG H

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

79%

Le Havre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

53%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

80%

Lyon H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

65%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

1 - 5 L

76%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

55%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

56%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

77%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with NAC averaging 0.8 and Angers averaging 0.6 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with NAC conceding 1.9 and Angers conceding 1.9 per match.

Angers has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

Angers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair