Compare NAC vs Fredericia

NAC vs Fredericia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Fredericia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC Home Team

Fredericia Away Team

NAC

33.2

W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Fredericia

38.8

L D L D D D L W L W

Categories Won

NAC

Draw

Fredericia

Performance Radar

NAC

Fredericia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-11

-6

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Nassoh (2 goals)

F. Etim (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

53.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 52.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

1.38

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.08

Adjusted Power Rating

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

38.8

Attack: 44.9, Defense: 38.0, Form: 20.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

NAC

Fredericia

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7

Defense 38.1

Form 20.8

Consistency 61.3

Power Rating Breakdown

38.8

Overall

Attack 44.9

Defense 38.0

Form 20.7

Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 52.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

NAC

Fredericia

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

67%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

Ajax H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

62%

Fortuna A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

61%

Sparta H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

44%

Zwolle A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

59%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 6 L

70%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 3 D

67%

Telstar A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

69%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

49%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 2 L

44%

Copenhagen H

Danish Superligaen

3 - 3 D

63%

OB H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 2 L

50%

Randers A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

52%

Silkeborg A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

57%

Vejle H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

39%

OB A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 1 L

55%

Copenhagen A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

68%

Randers H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 3 L

46%

Silkeborg H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 53.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Fredericia holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with NAC conceding 1.9 and Fredericia conceding 1.9 per match.

Fredericia has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Fredericia has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

Fredericia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair