Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Kryvbas KR

NAC vs Kryvbas KR Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Kryvbas KR: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Kryvbas KR Kryvbas KR Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Kryvbas KR
61.9
W W D L W W L W L D

Categories Won

0

NAC

2

Draw

13

Kryvbas KR

Performance Radar

NAC
Kryvbas KR

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
G. Mendoza (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

72.8

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 67.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

2.78

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.88

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

61.9

Attack: 77.8, Defense: 53.2, Form: 61.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

2
NAC
Kryvbas KR
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
Kryvbas KR

Power Rating Breakdown

61.9

Overall

Attack 77.8
Defense 53.2
Form 61.4
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 67.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 40%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
Kryvbas KR logo Kryvbas KR
W
Veres Rivne (67%)
W
Karpaty Lviv (81%)
D
SK Poltava (50%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (44%)
W
Kudrivka (60%)
L
LNZ Cherkasy (74%)
W
Epitsentr (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Veres Rivne A
3 - 1 W
67%
Karpaty Lviv H
1 - 0 W
81%
SK Poltava A
3 - 3 D
50%
Dynamo Kyiv H
5 - 6 L
78%
Rukh Vynnyky H
3 - 0 W
44%
Kudrivka A
2 - 1 W
60%
LNZ Cherkasy H
0 - 3 L
74%
Epitsentr H
2 - 1 W
74%
Polissya A
0 - 2 L
82%
Obolon A
0 - 0 D
63%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Kryvbas KR has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 72.8) compared to NAC (SoS: 53.8). This means Kryvbas KR's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Kryvbas KR's attack is on another level, averaging 1.9 goals per match with G. Mendoza leading the charge with 4 goals. NAC manages just 0.8 per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with NAC conceding 1.9 and Kryvbas KR conceding 1.7 per match.

Kryvbas KR has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Kryvbas KR emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (61.9 vs 33.2) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Kryvbas KR

Kryvbas KR

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more