Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Lokomotiva

NAC vs Lokomotiva Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Lokomotiva: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Lokomotiva Lokomotiva Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Lokomotiva
36.1
D L D W W W D L L D

Categories Won

1

NAC

6

Draw

8

Lokomotiva

Performance Radar

NAC
Lokomotiva

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
M. Sušak (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

34.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

0.92

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

36.1

Attack: 28.3, Defense: 45.3, Form: 25.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

1
NAC
Lokomotiva
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
Lokomotiva

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 28.3
Defense 45.3
Form 25.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 48.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
Lokomotiva logo Lokomotiva
D
Varaždin (54%)
L
Rijeka (44%)
D
Osijek (46%)
W
Slaven (35%)
W
Gorica (50%)
W
Istra (40%)
D
Vukovar (37%)
L
Dinamo Zagreb (71%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Varaždin A
1 - 1 D
54%
Rijeka H
0 - 3 L
44%
Osijek A
0 - 0 D
46%
Slaven H
2 - 1 W
35%
Gorica A
2 - 0 W
50%
Istra H
2 - 0 W
40%
Vukovar A
1 - 1 D
37%
Dinamo Zagreb H
0 - 5 L
71%
Hajduk A
1 - 2 L
58%
Varaždin H
1 - 1 D
48%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

NAC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.8) compared to Lokomotiva (SoS: 34.9). This means NAC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with NAC averaging 0.8 and Lokomotiva averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Lokomotiva has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Lokomotiva

Lokomotiva

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more