Skip to content
Compare NAC vs OFK

NAC vs OFK Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs OFK: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
OFK OFK Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

OFK
48.0
D L D D W D W D D D

Categories Won

2

NAC

5

Draw

8

OFK

Performance Radar

NAC
OFK

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

20%

2W, 7D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
Y. Silué (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

52.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

1.33

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

48.0

Attack: 47.7, Defense: 64.7, Form: 20.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

6
2

31-45'

1

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

4
NAC
OFK
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
OFK

Power Rating Breakdown

48.0

Overall

Attack 47.7
Defense 64.7
Form 20.4
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 50.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
OFK logo OFK
D
Partizan (57%)
L
Železničar P (62%)
D
Radnik (50%)
D
Čukarički (46%)
W
Novi Pazar (46%)
D
Radnik (50%)
W
Radnički Niš (49%)
D
FK IMT (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Partizan A
1 - 1 D
57%
Železničar P A
0 - 2 L
62%
Radnik H
1 - 1 D
50%
Čukarički H
0 - 0 D
46%
Novi Pazar A
5 - 1 W
46%
Radnik H
0 - 0 D
50%
Radnički Niš A
2 - 1 W
49%
FK IMT H
3 - 3 D
58%
Napredak A
2 - 2 D
34%
Radnički Krag H
0 - 0 D
52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 52.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

OFK holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

OFK has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

OFK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

OFK has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
OFK

OFK

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more