Skip to content
Compare NAC vs La Louvière

NAC vs La Louvière Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs La Louvière: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
La Louvière La Louvière Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

La Louvière
35.9
W L L L L L D W D D

Categories Won

4

NAC

3

Draw

8

La Louvière

Performance Radar

NAC
La Louvière

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
P. Fall (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

44.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

1.47

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

35.9

Attack: 44.1, Defense: 31.5, Form: 18.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

3
NAC
La Louvière
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
La Louvière

Power Rating Breakdown

35.9

Overall

Attack 44.1
Defense 31.5
Form 18.9
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
La Louvière logo La Louvière
W
Cercle Brugge (46%)
L
Dender (40%)
L
ZW (59%)
L
ZW (54%)
L
Cercle Brugge (63%)
L
Dender (46%)
D
Genk (61%)
W
Cercle Brugge (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cercle Brugge H
4 - 1 W
46%
Dender A
1 - 2 L
40%
ZW A
0 - 4 L
59%
ZW H
0 - 2 L
54%
Cercle Brugge A
0 - 3 L
63%
Dender H
0 - 1 L
46%
Genk H
5 - 5 D
61%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 1 W
63%
Antwerp H
0 - 0 D
52%
Standard A
1 - 1 D
72%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 44.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

La Louvière holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with NAC conceding 1.9 and La Louvière conceding 2.0 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
La Louvière

La Louvière

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more