Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Tondela

NAC vs Tondela Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Tondela: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Tondela Tondela Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Tondela
37.0
W W D L L D L D L D

Categories Won

2

NAC

7

Draw

6

Tondela

Performance Radar

NAC
Tondela

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
Rony Lopes (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

52.7

League Difficulty: 79.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

0.92

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

37.0

Attack: 30.8, Defense: 47.9, Form: 20.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

3
NAC
Tondela
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
Tondela

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 30.8
Defense 47.9
Form 20.5
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 79.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
Tondela logo Tondela
W
Moreirense (50%)
W
Casa Pia (53%)
D
Sporting (75%)
L
Nacional (52%)
L
Porto (74%)
D
Gil Vicente (55%)
L
Vitória SC (59%)
D
AVS (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Moreirense H
2 - 0 W
50%
Casa Pia A
1 - 0 W
53%
Sporting A
2 - 2 D
75%
Nacional H
0 - 2 L
52%
Porto A
0 - 2 L
74%
Gil Vicente H
2 - 2 D
55%
Vitória SC A
0 - 5 L
59%
AVS H
0 - 0 D
59%
Rio Ave H
0 - 1 L
61%
Santa Clara H
2 - 2 D
66%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 52.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with NAC averaging 0.8 and Tondela averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with NAC conceding 1.9 and Tondela conceding 1.6 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being unlikely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Tondela

Tondela

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more