Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Železničar P

NAC vs Železničar P Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Železničar P: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Železničar P Železničar P Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Železničar P
57.4
D W D D L W W L W D

Categories Won

0

NAC

2

Draw

13

Železničar P

Performance Radar

NAC
Železničar P

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
K. Karikari (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

55.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

1.64

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

57.4

Attack: 59.6, Defense: 73.6, Form: 42.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

6
NAC
Železničar P
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
Železničar P

Power Rating Breakdown

57.4

Overall

Attack 59.6
Defense 73.6
Form 42.0
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 55.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
Železničar P logo Železničar P
D
Radnik (50%)
W
OFK (53%)
D
Vojvodina (68%)
D
Red Star (69%)
L
Partizan (57%)
W
Javor (56%)
W
Novi Pazar (41%)
L
Čukarički (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Radnik H
1 - 1 D
50%
OFK H
2 - 0 W
53%
Vojvodina A
0 - 0 D
68%
Red Star H
2 - 2 D
69%
Partizan A
1 - 2 L
57%
Javor A
2 - 1 W
56%
Novi Pazar H
2 - 0 W
41%
Čukarički A
2 - 3 L
50%
Mladost Lučani H
5 - 0 W
48%
TSC A
0 - 0 D
60%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 55.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Železničar P holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Železničar P is far superior, conceding just 0.9 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while NAC leaks 1.9 per match.

Železničar P has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Železničar P emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (57.4 vs 33.2) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Železničar P

Železničar P

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more