Compare Nantes vs GC Zürich

Nantes vs GC Zürich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Nantes vs GC Zürich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Nantes Home Team

GC Zürich Away Team

Nantes

38.1

L W L L D D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

GC Zürich

27.9

W L L L W L L L L L

Categories Won

Nantes

Draw

GC Zürich

Performance Radar

Nantes

GC Zürich

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

20%

2W, 0D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match

0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

-16

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Abline (2 goals)

D. Abels (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

57.4

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.6

50.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 5 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.95

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.25

1.0

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating

38.1

Attack: 25.1, Defense: 64.4, Form: 10.7

27.9

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 13.4, Form: 20.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Nantes

GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

38.1

Overall

Attack 25.1

Defense 64.4

Form 10.7

Consistency 74.8

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 33.5

Defense 13.4

Form 20.1

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Nantes

GC Zürich

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lens A

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

76%

Marseille H

French Ligue 1

3 - 0 W

61%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

80%

Paris SG A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

84%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

56%

Auxerre A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

71%

Metz A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

48%

Strasbourg H

French Ligue 1

2 - 3 L

55%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

47%

Lille A

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

78%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Winterthur H

Swiss Super League

3 - 2 W

42%

Zürich A

Swiss Super League

1 - 2 L

42%

Servette H

Swiss Super League

0 - 2 L

65%

Luzern H

Swiss Super League

1 - 2 L

56%

Winterthur A

Brack Super League

2 - 0 W

42%

Sion H

Brack Super League

0 - 4 L

62%

Servette A

Brack Super League

0 - 5 L

66%

Thun A

Brack Super League

1 - 5 L

49%

Lausanne H

Brack Super League

2 - 3 L

38%

Basel A

Brack Super League

0 - 1 L

51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.4 vs 50.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

GC Zürich holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus Nantes's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Nantes is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while GC Zürich leaks 2.6 per match.

Nantes has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Nantes has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Nantes

GC Zürich

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair