Compare Nantes vs Randers

Nantes vs Randers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Nantes vs Randers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Nantes Home Team

Randers Away Team

Nantes

38.1

L W L L D D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Randers

42.7

D W L D L L D L W W

Categories Won

Nantes

Draw

Randers

Performance Radar

Nantes

Randers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

-3

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Abline (2 goals)

E. Mahmoud (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

57.4

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.6

53.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 5 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.95

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.25

1.15

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating

38.1

Attack: 25.1, Defense: 64.4, Form: 10.7

42.7

Attack: 44.7, Defense: 48.1, Form: 30.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Nantes

Randers

Power Rating Breakdown

38.1

Overall

Attack 25.1

Defense 64.4

Form 10.7

Consistency 74.8

Power Rating Breakdown

42.7

Overall

Attack 44.7

Defense 48.1

Form 30.9

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 51.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Nantes

Randers

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lens A

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

76%

Marseille H

French Ligue 1

3 - 0 W

61%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

80%

Paris SG A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

84%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

56%

Auxerre A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

71%

Metz A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

48%

Strasbourg H

French Ligue 1

2 - 3 L

55%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

47%

Lille A

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

78%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

OB H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

50%

Vejle H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 0 W

39%

Silkeborg A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 2 L

57%

Fredericia H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

43%

OB A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 3 L

55%

Copenhagen H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

63%

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

44%

Silkeborg H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 3 L

52%

Fredericia A

Danish Superligaen

3 - 0 W

48%

Copenhagen A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

68%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.4 vs 53.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Randers holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Nantes's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Nantes has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Randers's 1.6.

Nantes has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Randers has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Nantes

Randers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair