Skip to content
Compare Napredak vs Hamburg

Napredak vs Hamburg Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Napredak vs Hamburg: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Napredak Napredak Home Team
Hamburg Hamburg Away Team
Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Last 10 Matches

Hamburg
41.5
W W L L L D L D W L

Categories Won

1

Napredak

4

Draw

10

Hamburg

Performance Radar

Napredak
Hamburg

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 1D, 8L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
R. Glatzel (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

59.5

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 66.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

1.67

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.37

Adjusted Power Rating
25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

41.5

Attack: 47.5, Defense: 40.2, Form: 32.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

5
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

Napredak
Hamburg
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8
Hamburg

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 47.5
Defense 40.2
Form 32.9
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 91.0

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 66.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
Hamburg logo Hamburg
W
Freiburg (67%)
W
Frankfurt (67%)
L
Hoffenheim (65%)
L
Bremen (67%)
L
Stuttgart (75%)
D
Augsburg (66%)
L
Dortmund (76%)
D
Köln (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Freiburg H
3 - 2 W
67%
Frankfurt A
2 - 1 W
67%
Hoffenheim H
1 - 2 L
65%
Bremen A
1 - 3 L
67%
Stuttgart A
0 - 4 L
75%
Augsburg H
1 - 1 D
66%
Dortmund A
2 - 3 L
76%
Köln H
1 - 1 D
57%
Wolfsburg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Leverkusen H
0 - 1 L
65%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Hamburg has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.5) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Hamburg's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Hamburg holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Hamburg has the defensive edge, conceding 1.9 per match compared to Napredak's 2.4.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Hamburg emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (41.5 vs 25.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Napredak

Napredak

VS
Hamburg

Hamburg

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more