Skip to content
Compare Napredak vs NEC

Napredak vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Napredak vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Napredak Napredak Home Team
NEC NEC Away Team
Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Last 10 Matches

NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

1

Napredak

1

Draw

13

NEC

Performance Radar

Napredak
NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 1D, 8L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
B. Linssen (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Napredak
NEC
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, NEC is far superior, conceding just 1.3 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Napredak leaks 2.4 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, NEC is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (66.6), defense (66.6), and form (35.2) leaves little room for doubt. Napredak will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Napredak

Napredak

VS
NEC

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more