Skip to content
Compare Napredak vs La Louvière

Napredak vs La Louvière Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Napredak vs La Louvière: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Napredak Napredak Home Team
La Louvière La Louvière Away Team
Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Last 10 Matches

La Louvière
35.9
W L L L L L D W D D

Categories Won

1

Napredak

3

Draw

11

La Louvière

Performance Radar

Napredak
La Louvière

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 1D, 8L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
P. Fall (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

44.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

1.47

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

35.9

Attack: 44.1, Defense: 31.5, Form: 18.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

3
Napredak
La Louvière
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8
La Louvière

Power Rating Breakdown

35.9

Overall

Attack 44.1
Defense 31.5
Form 18.9
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
La Louvière logo La Louvière
W
Cercle Brugge (46%)
L
Dender (40%)
L
ZW (59%)
L
ZW (54%)
L
Cercle Brugge (63%)
L
Dender (46%)
D
Genk (61%)
W
Cercle Brugge (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cercle Brugge H
4 - 1 W
46%
Dender A
1 - 2 L
40%
ZW A
0 - 4 L
59%
ZW H
0 - 2 L
54%
Cercle Brugge A
0 - 3 L
63%
Dender H
0 - 1 L
46%
Genk H
5 - 5 D
61%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 1 W
63%
Antwerp H
0 - 0 D
52%
Standard A
1 - 1 D
72%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 41.4 vs 44.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

La Louvière holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

La Louvière has the defensive edge, conceding 2.0 per match compared to Napredak's 2.4.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

La Louvière has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Napredak

Napredak

VS
La Louvière

La Louvière

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more