Skip to content
Compare Napredak vs Volos

Napredak vs Volos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Napredak vs Volos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Napredak Napredak Home Team
Volos Volos Away Team
Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Last 10 Matches

Volos
34.6
L L L D W L D D L D

Categories Won

3

Napredak

4

Draw

8

Volos

Performance Radar

Napredak
Volos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 1D, 8L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
J. Hurtado (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

53.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 51.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

1.2

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

34.6

Attack: 41.4, Defense: 31.0, Form: 10.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Napredak
Volos
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8
Volos

Power Rating Breakdown

34.6

Overall

Attack 41.4
Defense 31.0
Form 10.3
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 51.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
Volos logo Volos
L
Levadiakos (44%)
L
Levadiakos (49%)
L
Aris (58%)
D
OFI (44%)
W
PAOK (54%)
L
Kifisia (54%)
D
OFI (44%)
D
AEK Athens (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levadiakos H
0 - 3 L
44%
Levadiakos A
2 - 5 L
49%
Aris A
2 - 3 L
58%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
PAOK H
2 - 1 W
54%
Kifisia A
0 - 2 L
54%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
AEK Athens H
2 - 2 D
62%
Panserraikos A
1 - 2 L
54%
Aris H
1 - 1 D
53%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Volos has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.4) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Volos's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Volos holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Napredak conceding 2.4 and Volos conceding 2.1 per match.

Volos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Volos has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Napredak

Napredak

VS
Volos

Volos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more