Skip to content
Compare NEC vs Brøndby

NEC vs Brøndby Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NEC vs Brøndby: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NEC NEC Home Team
Brøndby Brøndby Away Team
NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Last 10 Matches

Brøndby
42.4
L D L W W L L D L D

Categories Won

11

NEC

2

Draw

2

Brøndby

Performance Radar

NEC
Brøndby

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Linssen (5 goals)
J. Ambæk (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record
50%

1W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

1.03

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

42.4

Attack: 34.8, Defense: 66.1, Form: 20.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
NEC
Brøndby
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8
Brøndby

Power Rating Breakdown

42.4

Overall

Attack 34.8
Defense 66.1
Form 20.9
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

65.7 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)
Brøndby logo Brøndby
L
AGF (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
L
Sønderjyske (48%)
W
Viborg (55%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
L
Midtjylland (52%)
L
Nordsjælland (60%)
D
AGF (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AGF H
0 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Sønderjyske A
0 - 3 L
48%
Viborg A
1 - 0 W
55%
Sønderjyske H
6 - 0 W
43%
Midtjylland H
1 - 2 L
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 2 L
60%
AGF A
0 - 0 D
62%
Viborg H
0 - 1 L
50%
Midtjylland A
0 - 0 D
57%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Brøndby (SoS: 54.3). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Brøndby's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with NEC conceding 1.3 and Brøndby conceding 1.1 per match.

Brøndby has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NEC

NEC

VS
Brøndby

Brøndby

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more