Skip to content
Compare NEC vs Javor

NEC vs Javor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NEC vs Javor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NEC NEC Home Team
Javor Javor Away Team
NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Last 10 Matches

Javor
46.5
L D W L W L W D D W

Categories Won

9

NEC

3

Draw

3

Javor

Performance Radar

NEC
Javor

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

0

0

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Linssen (5 goals)
A. Radonjić (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

49.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 45.6

Elite Opponent Record
50%

1W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

1.17

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

46.5

Attack: 43.1, Defense: 56.3, Form: 39.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

3

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

2
NEC
Javor
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8
Javor

Power Rating Breakdown

46.5

Overall

Attack 43.1
Defense 56.3
Form 39.8
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

65.7 vs 45.6

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)
Javor logo Javor
L
TSC (60%)
D
FK IMT (58%)
W
Napredak (29%)
L
Radnički Niš (49%)
W
Spartak (28%)
L
Železničar P (57%)
W
Spartak (33%)
D
Novi Pazar (41%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
TSC A
1 - 6 L
60%
FK IMT H
0 - 0 D
58%
Napredak H
4 - 0 W
29%
Radnički Niš A
2 - 3 L
49%
Spartak H
1 - 0 W
28%
Železničar P H
1 - 2 L
57%
Spartak A
2 - 1 W
33%
Novi Pazar H
0 - 0 D
41%
Radnik A
1 - 1 D
55%
Čukarički H
1 - 0 W
46%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Javor (SoS: 49.4). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Javor's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with NEC conceding 1.3 and Javor conceding 1.3 per match.

Javor has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NEC

NEC

VS
Javor

Javor

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more