Compare NEC vs Lausanne

NEC vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NEC vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NEC Home Team

Lausanne Away Team

NEC

56.6

L D D D W D W W L D

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne

33.3

L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

NEC

Draw

Lausanne

Performance Radar

NEC

Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

B. Linssen (5 goals)

Omar Janneh (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

50%

1W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

NEC

Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6

Defense 66.6

Form 35.2

Consistency 62.8

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7

Defense 28.9

Form 34.7

Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

65.7 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%

NEC

Lausanne

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

66%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

64%

Twente A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

81%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Excelsior A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

60%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

67%

PSV A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

80%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

49%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 3 L

56%

Ajax A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Servette A

Swiss Super League

0 - 2 L

70%

Winterthur A

Swiss Super League

1 - 2 L

46%

Luzern H

Swiss Super League

1 - 3 L

56%

Zürich H

Swiss Super League

3 - 0 W

37%

Sion A

Brack Super League

0 - 3 L

66%

Winterthur H

Brack Super League

2 - 1 W

38%

Luzern A

Brack Super League

0 - 4 L

57%

Young Boys H

Brack Super League

0 - 2 L

50%

GC Zürich A

Brack Super League

3 - 2 W

32%

Zürich A

Brack Super League

2 - 1 W

38%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Lausanne (SoS: 36.8). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Lausanne's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

NEC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Lausanne's 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.6 vs 33.3) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NEC

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair