Compare NEC vs Charleroi

NEC vs Charleroi Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NEC vs Charleroi: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NEC Home Team

Charleroi Away Team

NEC

56.6

L D D D W D W W L D

Last 10 Matches

Charleroi

42.5

W W W D L W L L L D

Categories Won

NEC

Draw

Charleroi

Performance Radar

NEC

Charleroi

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

B. Linssen (5 goals)

A. Bernier (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

42.2

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 52.5

Elite Opponent Record

50%

1W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

1.03

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

42.5

Attack: 33.8, Defense: 58.4, Form: 36.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

NEC

Charleroi

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6

Defense 66.6

Form 35.2

Consistency 62.8

Power Rating Breakdown

42.5

Overall

Attack 33.8

Defense 58.4

Form 36.9

Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

65.7 vs 52.5

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%

NEC

Charleroi

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

66%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

64%

Twente A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

81%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Excelsior A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

60%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

67%

PSV A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

80%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

49%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 3 L

56%

Ajax A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 0 W

45%

Genk H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

49%

OHL A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

40%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

55%

Antwerp H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

62%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

70%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

47%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Charleroi (SoS: 42.2). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Charleroi's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with NEC conceding 1.3 and Charleroi conceding 1.1 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NEC

Charleroi

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair