Skip to content
Compare Nieciecza vs Thun

Nieciecza vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Nieciecza vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Nieciecza Nieciecza Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Nieciecza
33.8
L L W L L W L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

2

Nieciecza

6

Draw

7

Thun

Performance Radar

Nieciecza
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Zapolnik (3 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
56.1

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.99

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.11

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
33.8

Attack: 38.9, Defense: 28.3, Form: 21.2

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

2
Nieciecza
Thun
Nieciecza

Power Rating Breakdown

33.8

Overall

Attack 38.9
Defense 28.3
Form 21.2
Consistency 57.7
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Nieciecza logo Nieciecza
L
Legia (59%)
L
GKS Katowice (64%)
W
Zagłębie (54%)
L
Wisła Płock (42%)
L
Widzew (59%)
W
Piast (53%)
L
Lech (69%)
L
Motor (54%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Legia H
0 - 1 L
59%
GKS Katowice A
1 - 5 L
64%
Zagłębie A
2 - 1 W
54%
Wisła Płock H
1 - 3 L
42%
Widzew A
0 - 1 L
59%
Piast H
3 - 2 W
53%
Lech A
1 - 4 L
69%
Motor H
1 - 2 L
54%
Kielce A
1 - 2 L
48%
Radomiak H
1 - 1 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Nieciecza has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.1) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Nieciecza's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Nieciecza's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Thun has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Nieciecza's 2.2.

Nieciecza has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Thun has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Nieciecza

Nieciecza

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more