Skip to content
Compare Obolon vs Lausanne

Obolon vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Obolon vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Obolon Obolon Home Team
Lausanne Lausanne Away Team
Obolon
37.6
D D L D L D L L D W

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

6

Obolon

4

Draw

5

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Obolon
Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 5D, 4L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Liakh (3 goals)
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 68.2

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.31

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.31

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
37.6

Attack: 37.7, Defense: 45.2, Form: 11.3

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

1
Obolon
Lausanne
Obolon

Power Rating Breakdown

37.6

Overall

Attack 37.7
Defense 45.2
Form 11.3
Consistency 77.2
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

68.2 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Obolon logo Obolon
D
Epitsentr (74%)
D
Kudrivka (55%)
L
Polissya (82%)
D
SK Poltava (45%)
L
Veres Rivne (67%)
D
Zorya (75%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (86%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (83%)
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Epitsentr H
2 - 2 D
74%
Kudrivka H
1 - 1 D
55%
Polissya A
1 - 3 L
82%
SK Poltava H
1 - 1 D
45%
Veres Rivne A
0 - 2 L
67%
Zorya H
3 - 3 D
75%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 4 L
86%
Dynamo Kyiv A
1 - 2 L
83%
Kryvbas KR H
0 - 0 D
71%
Rukh Vynnyky H
1 - 0 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Obolon has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.1) compared to Lausanne (SoS: 36.8). This means Obolon's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Obolon averaging 1.0 and Lausanne averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Obolon conceding 1.8 and Lausanne conceding 2.0 per match.

Obolon has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Obolon

Obolon

VS
Lausanne

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more