Skip to content
Compare Obolon vs NEC

Obolon vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Obolon vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Obolon Obolon Home Team
NEC NEC Away Team
Obolon
37.6
D D L D L D L L D W

Last 10 Matches

NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

0

Obolon

3

Draw

12

NEC

Performance Radar

Obolon
NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 5D, 4L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Liakh (3 goals)
B. Linssen (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 68.2

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 6 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.31

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.31

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
37.6

Attack: 37.7, Defense: 45.2, Form: 11.3

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

3

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Obolon
NEC
Obolon

Power Rating Breakdown

37.6

Overall

Attack 37.7
Defense 45.2
Form 11.3
Consistency 77.2
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

68.2 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Obolon logo Obolon
D
Epitsentr (74%)
D
Kudrivka (55%)
L
Polissya (82%)
D
SK Poltava (45%)
L
Veres Rivne (67%)
D
Zorya (75%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (86%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (83%)
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Epitsentr H
2 - 2 D
74%
Kudrivka H
1 - 1 D
55%
Polissya A
1 - 3 L
82%
SK Poltava H
1 - 1 D
45%
Veres Rivne A
0 - 2 L
67%
Zorya H
3 - 3 D
75%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 4 L
86%
Dynamo Kyiv A
1 - 2 L
83%
Kryvbas KR H
0 - 0 D
71%
Rukh Vynnyky H
1 - 0 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 63.1 vs 67.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Obolon's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

NEC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Obolon's 1.8.

Obolon has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.6 vs 37.6) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Obolon

Obolon

VS
NEC

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more