Skip to content
Compare Obolon vs Thun

Obolon vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Obolon vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Obolon Obolon Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Obolon
37.6
D D L D L D L L D W

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

2

Obolon

3

Draw

10

Thun

Performance Radar

Obolon
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 5D, 4L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Liakh (3 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 68.2

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.31

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.31

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
37.6

Attack: 37.7, Defense: 45.2, Form: 11.3

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

4

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

2
Obolon
Thun
Obolon

Power Rating Breakdown

37.6

Overall

Attack 37.7
Defense 45.2
Form 11.3
Consistency 77.2
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

68.2 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Obolon logo Obolon
D
Epitsentr (74%)
D
Kudrivka (55%)
L
Polissya (82%)
D
SK Poltava (45%)
L
Veres Rivne (67%)
D
Zorya (75%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (86%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (83%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Epitsentr H
2 - 2 D
74%
Kudrivka H
1 - 1 D
55%
Polissya A
1 - 3 L
82%
SK Poltava H
1 - 1 D
45%
Veres Rivne A
0 - 2 L
67%
Zorya H
3 - 3 D
75%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 4 L
86%
Dynamo Kyiv A
1 - 2 L
83%
Kryvbas KR H
0 - 0 D
71%
Rukh Vynnyky H
1 - 0 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Obolon has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.1) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Obolon's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Obolon's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Thun has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Obolon's 1.8.

Obolon has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Obolon

Obolon

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more