Skip to content
Compare OFK vs WAC

OFK vs WAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare OFK vs WAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

OFK OFK Home Team
WAC WAC Away Team
OFK
48.0
D L D D W D W D D D

Last 10 Matches

WAC
41.5
W W W L D D L D L L

Categories Won

8

OFK

3

Draw

4

WAC

Performance Radar

OFK
WAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 7D, 1L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Y. Silué (4 goals)
D. Baumgartner (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.4

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.33

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.07

0.97

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
48.0

Attack: 47.7, Defense: 64.7, Form: 20.4

41.5

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 59.1, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
6

16-30'

1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

2
OFK
WAC
OFK

Power Rating Breakdown

48.0

Overall

Attack 47.7
Defense 64.7
Form 20.4
Consistency 75.7
WAC

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 31.3
Defense 59.1
Form 31.3
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.4 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
OFK logo OFK
D
Partizan (57%)
L
Železničar P (62%)
D
Radnik (50%)
D
Čukarički (46%)
W
Novi Pazar (46%)
D
Radnik (50%)
W
Radnički Niš (49%)
D
FK IMT (58%)
WAC logo WAC
W
Ried (55%)
W
Altach (48%)
W
GAK (53%)
L
BW Linz (60%)
D
BW Linz (55%)
D
Ried (50%)
L
WSG Tirol (48%)
D
Altach (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Partizan A
1 - 1 D
57%
Železničar P A
0 - 2 L
62%
Radnik H
1 - 1 D
50%
Čukarički H
0 - 0 D
46%
Novi Pazar A
5 - 1 W
46%
Radnik H
0 - 0 D
50%
Radnički Niš A
2 - 1 W
49%
FK IMT H
3 - 3 D
58%
Napredak A
2 - 2 D
34%
Radnički Krag H
0 - 0 D
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ried A
1 - 0 W
55%
Altach A
4 - 1 W
48%
GAK H
1 - 0 W
53%
BW Linz A
0 - 3 L
60%
BW Linz H
0 - 0 D
55%
Ried H
0 - 0 D
50%
WSG Tirol A
1 - 3 L
48%
Altach H
1 - 1 D
43%
GAK A
0 - 2 L
58%
LASK A
1 - 3 L
69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.2 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

OFK holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus WAC's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with OFK conceding 1.1 and WAC conceding 1.3 per match.

OFK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

WAC has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

OFK has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

OFK

OFK

VS
WAC

WAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more