Skip to content
Compare Panathinaikos vs Thun

Panathinaikos vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Panathinaikos vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Panathinaikos Panathinaikos Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Panathinaikos
45.5
L D L D W L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

5

Panathinaikos

4

Draw

6

Thun

Performance Radar

Panathinaikos
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Zaroury (2 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.1

League Difficulty: 61.8, Opponent Quality: 58.1

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.25

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
45.5

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 60.2, Form: 38.0

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

2
Panathinaikos
Thun
Panathinaikos

Power Rating Breakdown

45.5

Overall

Attack 38.0
Defense 60.2
Form 38.0
Consistency 50.5
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

61.8 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

58.1 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Panathinaikos logo Panathinaikos
L
AEK Athens (67%)
D
AEK Athens (62%)
L
Olympiakos (56%)
D
PAOK (59%)
W
Asteras (61%)
L
Betis (70%)
D
Panaitolikos (48%)
W
Betis (65%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AEK Athens A
1 - 2 L
67%
AEK Athens H
0 - 0 D
62%
Olympiakos H
0 - 2 L
56%
PAOK A
0 - 0 D
59%
Asteras A
2 - 1 W
61%
Betis A
0 - 4 L
70%
Panaitolikos H
0 - 0 D
48%
Betis H
1 - 0 W
65%
Levadiakos A
4 - 1 W
49%
OFI H
4 - 1 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.1 vs 37.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Panathinaikos's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Panathinaikos has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Panathinaikos

Panathinaikos

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more