Skip to content
Compare Pardubice vs Como

Pardubice vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Pardubice vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Pardubice Pardubice Home Team
Como Como Away Team
Pardubice
55.2
L W W W W W L W D L

Last 10 Matches

Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Categories Won

4

Pardubice

2

Draw

9

Como

Performance Radar

Pardubice
Como

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
V. Patrák (5 goals)
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.49

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.09

2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
55.2

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 62.2, Form: 62.2

62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Pardubice
Como
Pardubice

Power Rating Breakdown

55.2

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 62.2
Form 62.2
Consistency 43.3
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 85.5

Opponent Quality

50.6 vs 65.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%
Pardubice logo Pardubice
L
Karviná (43%)
W
Karviná (48%)
W
Zlín (41%)
W
Plzeň (64%)
W
Olomouc (46%)
W
Dukla (51%)
L
Ml. Boleslav (66%)
W
Karviná (48%)
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Karviná H
1 - 3 L
43%
Karviná A
2 - 1 W
48%
Zlín H
3 - 1 W
41%
Plzeň A
1 - 0 W
64%
Olomouc H
2 - 1 W
46%
Dukla A
2 - 0 W
51%
Ml. Boleslav A
0 - 2 L
66%
Karviná A
2 - 1 W
48%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
49%
Slovácko A
0 - 2 L
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.6 vs 63.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Como holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Pardubice's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Pardubice conceding 1.2 and Como conceding 1.1 per match.

Pardubice has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Pardubice is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Como has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Pardubice

Pardubice

VS
Como

Como

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more