Skip to content
Compare Pardubice vs Tromsø

Pardubice vs Tromsø Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Pardubice vs Tromsø: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Pardubice Pardubice Home Team
Tromsø Tromsø Away Team
Pardubice
55.2
L W W W W W L W D L

Last 10 Matches

Tromsø
64.8
W D L W W D W W W W

Categories Won

3

Pardubice

4

Draw

8

Tromsø

Performance Radar

Pardubice
Tromsø

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

70%

7W, 2D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
V. Patrák (5 goals)
J. Hjertø-Dahl (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

71%

5W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

48.0

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 46.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.49

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.09

1.56

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
55.2

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 62.2, Form: 62.2

64.8

Attack: 55.5, Defense: 71.9, Form: 68.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

3
4

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

3
Pardubice
Tromsø
Pardubice

Power Rating Breakdown

55.2

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 62.2
Form 62.2
Consistency 43.3
Tromsø

Power Rating Breakdown

64.8

Overall

Attack 55.5
Defense 71.9
Form 68.6
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

50.6 vs 46.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Pardubice logo Pardubice
L
Karviná (43%)
W
Karviná (48%)
W
Zlín (41%)
W
Plzeň (64%)
W
Olomouc (46%)
W
Dukla (51%)
L
Ml. Boleslav (66%)
W
Karviná (48%)
Tromsø logo Tromsø
W
Molde (52%)
D
Start (40%)
L
Brann (45%)
W
Sandefjord (50%)
W
Sarpsborg (47%)
D
Lillestrøm (57%)
W
Kristiansund (45%)
W
Rosenborg (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Karviná H
1 - 3 L
43%
Karviná A
2 - 1 W
48%
Zlín H
3 - 1 W
41%
Plzeň A
1 - 0 W
64%
Olomouc H
2 - 1 W
46%
Dukla A
2 - 0 W
51%
Ml. Boleslav A
0 - 2 L
66%
Karviná A
2 - 1 W
48%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
49%
Slovácko A
0 - 2 L
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Molde H
2 - 0 W
52%
Start A
1 - 1 D
40%
Brann H
0 - 5 L
45%
Sandefjord H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sarpsborg A
1 - 0 W
47%
Lillestrøm H
0 - 0 D
57%
Kristiansund H
2 - 0 W
45%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
42%
Brann A
2 - 1 W
50%
Fredrikstad H
4 - 0 W
39%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.6 vs 48.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Tromsø holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Pardubice's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Tromsø has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Pardubice's 1.2.

Pardubice has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tromsø has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tromsø is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Tromsø has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Pardubice

Pardubice

VS
Tromsø

Tromsø

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more