Skip to content
Compare Parma vs Kryvbas KR

Parma vs Kryvbas KR Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Parma vs Kryvbas KR: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Parma Parma Home Team
Kryvbas KR Kryvbas KR Away Team
Parma
40.5
L L W W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Kryvbas KR
61.9
W W D L W W L W L D

Categories Won

1

Parma

3

Draw

11

Kryvbas KR

Performance Radar

Parma
Kryvbas KR

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Elphege (2 goals)
G. Mendoza (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.0

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

72.8

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 67.3

Elite Opponent Record
14%

1W / 7 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.0

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.2

2.78

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.88

Adjusted Power Rating
40.5

Attack: 30.1, Defense: 60.3, Form: 22.6

61.9

Attack: 77.8, Defense: 53.2, Form: 61.4

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

2
Parma
Kryvbas KR
Parma

Power Rating Breakdown

40.5

Overall

Attack 30.1
Defense 60.3
Form 22.6
Consistency 64.0
Kryvbas KR

Power Rating Breakdown

61.9

Overall

Attack 77.8
Defense 53.2
Form 61.4
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

67.2 vs 67.3

Elite Opponent Record

14% vs 40%
Parma logo Parma
L
Roma (70%)
L
Inter Milan (84%)
W
Pisa (40%)
W
Udinese (79%)
D
Napoli (74%)
D
Lazio (76%)
L
Cremonese (51%)
L
Torino (74%)
Kryvbas KR logo Kryvbas KR
W
Veres Rivne (67%)
W
Karpaty Lviv (81%)
D
SK Poltava (50%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (44%)
W
Kudrivka (60%)
L
LNZ Cherkasy (74%)
W
Epitsentr (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Roma H
2 - 3 L
70%
Inter Milan A
0 - 2 L
84%
Pisa H
1 - 0 W
40%
Udinese A
1 - 0 W
79%
Napoli H
1 - 1 D
74%
Lazio A
1 - 1 D
76%
Cremonese H
0 - 2 L
51%
Torino A
1 - 4 L
74%
Fiorentina A
0 - 0 D
71%
Cagliari H
1 - 1 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Veres Rivne A
3 - 1 W
67%
Karpaty Lviv H
1 - 0 W
81%
SK Poltava A
3 - 3 D
50%
Dynamo Kyiv H
5 - 6 L
78%
Rukh Vynnyky H
3 - 0 W
44%
Kudrivka A
2 - 1 W
60%
LNZ Cherkasy H
0 - 3 L
74%
Epitsentr H
2 - 1 W
74%
Polissya A
0 - 2 L
82%
Obolon A
0 - 0 D
63%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 63.0 vs 72.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Kryvbas KR's attack is on another level, averaging 1.9 goals per match with G. Mendoza leading the charge with 4 goals. Parma manages just 0.8 per match.

Parma has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Kryvbas KR's 1.7.

Parma has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Kryvbas KR has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Kryvbas KR emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (61.9 vs 40.5) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Parma

Parma

VS
Kryvbas KR

Kryvbas KR

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more