Skip to content
Compare Parma vs NEC

Parma vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Parma vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Parma Parma Home Team
NEC NEC Away Team
Parma
40.5
L L W W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

1

Parma

2

Draw

12

NEC

Performance Radar

Parma
NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Elphege (2 goals)
B. Linssen (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.0

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
14%

1W / 7 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.0

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.2

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
40.5

Attack: 30.1, Defense: 60.3, Form: 22.6

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

4

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Parma
NEC
Parma

Power Rating Breakdown

40.5

Overall

Attack 30.1
Defense 60.3
Form 22.6
Consistency 64.0
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

67.2 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

14% vs 50%
Parma logo Parma
L
Roma (70%)
L
Inter Milan (84%)
W
Pisa (40%)
W
Udinese (79%)
D
Napoli (74%)
D
Lazio (76%)
L
Cremonese (51%)
L
Torino (74%)
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Roma H
2 - 3 L
70%
Inter Milan A
0 - 2 L
84%
Pisa H
1 - 0 W
40%
Udinese A
1 - 0 W
79%
Napoli H
1 - 1 D
74%
Lazio A
1 - 1 D
76%
Cremonese H
0 - 2 L
51%
Torino A
1 - 4 L
74%
Fiorentina A
0 - 0 D
71%
Cagliari H
1 - 1 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 63.0 vs 67.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Parma's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Parma conceding 1.4 and NEC conceding 1.3 per match.

Parma has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.6 vs 40.5) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Parma

Parma

VS
NEC

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more