Skip to content
Compare Parma vs Radnički Niš

Parma vs Radnički Niš Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Parma vs Radnički Niš: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Parma Parma Home Team
Radnički Niš Radnički Niš Away Team
Parma
40.5
L L W W D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Radnički Niš
36.1
W W L W D L L L L D

Categories Won

6

Parma

2

Draw

7

Radnički Niš

Performance Radar

Parma
Radnički Niš

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Elphege (2 goals)
A. Shestyuk (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.0

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

Elite Opponent Record
14%

1W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.0

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.2

1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
40.5

Attack: 30.1, Defense: 60.3, Form: 22.6

36.1

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

4

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

2
Parma
Radnički Niš
Parma

Power Rating Breakdown

40.5

Overall

Attack 30.1
Defense 60.3
Form 22.6
Consistency 64.0
Radnički Niš

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 42.3
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

67.2 vs 53.2

Elite Opponent Record

14% vs 0%
Parma logo Parma
L
Roma (70%)
L
Inter Milan (84%)
W
Pisa (40%)
W
Udinese (79%)
D
Napoli (74%)
D
Lazio (76%)
L
Cremonese (51%)
L
Torino (74%)
Radnički Niš logo Radnički Niš
W
Mladost Lučani (48%)
W
Napredak (34%)
L
FK IMT (63%)
W
Javor (52%)
D
Radnički Krag (57%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
L
OFK (53%)
L
Red Star (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Roma H
2 - 3 L
70%
Inter Milan A
0 - 2 L
84%
Pisa H
1 - 0 W
40%
Udinese A
1 - 0 W
79%
Napoli H
1 - 1 D
74%
Lazio A
1 - 1 D
76%
Cremonese H
0 - 2 L
51%
Torino A
1 - 4 L
74%
Fiorentina A
0 - 0 D
71%
Cagliari H
1 - 1 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mladost Lučani H
1 - 0 W
48%
Napredak A
1 - 0 W
34%
FK IMT A
0 - 2 L
63%
Javor H
3 - 2 W
52%
Radnički Krag A
1 - 1 D
57%
Vojvodina A
2 - 3 L
68%
OFK H
1 - 2 L
53%
Red Star A
0 - 2 L
74%
Spartak H
0 - 2 L
28%
Radnik A
2 - 2 D
55%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Parma has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.0) compared to Radnički Niš (SoS: 40.6). This means Parma's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Radnički Niš holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus Parma's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Parma conceding 1.4 and Radnički Niš conceding 1.6 per match.

Parma has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Parma

Parma

VS
Radnički Niš

Radnički Niš

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more