Porto vs Silkeborg Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Porto vs Silkeborg: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Porto
Home Team
Silkeborg
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Porto
Draw
Silkeborg
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
6W, 2D, 2L
5W, 2D, 3L
16 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
+6
-3
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 80.8, Opponent Quality: 64.4
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.8
0W / 2 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.13
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 55.9, Defense: 69.9, Form: 62.9
Attack: 58.1, Defense: 34.2, Form: 51.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Porto
Silkeborg
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.9 vs 52.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Porto averaging 1.6 and Silkeborg averaging 1.7 goals per match.
Defensively, Porto is far superior, conceding just 1.0 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Silkeborg leaks 2.0 per match.
Silkeborg has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Silkeborg is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Porto has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Porto
Silkeborg
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams