Skip to content
Compare Porto vs Thun

Porto vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Porto vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Porto Porto Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Porto
60.9
L W W W L W D D W W

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

8

Porto

5

Draw

2

Thun

Performance Radar

Porto
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
William (3 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.9

League Difficulty: 80.8, Opponent Quality: 64.4

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.73

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.13

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
60.9

Attack: 55.9, Defense: 69.9, Form: 62.9

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
4

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

4
4

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

2
Porto
Thun
Porto

Power Rating Breakdown

60.9

Overall

Attack 55.9
Defense 69.9
Form 62.9
Consistency 52.0
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.8 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

64.4 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Porto logo Porto
L
AVS (64%)
W
Alverca (59%)
W
Estrela (54%)
W
Tondela (52%)
L
Nottm Forest (81%)
W
Estoril (52%)
D
Nottm Forest (76%)
D
Famalicão (69%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AVS A
1 - 3 L
64%
Alverca H
1 - 0 W
59%
Estrela A
2 - 1 W
54%
Tondela H
2 - 0 W
52%
Nottm Forest A
0 - 1 L
81%
Estoril A
3 - 1 W
52%
Nottm Forest H
1 - 1 D
76%
Famalicão H
2 - 2 D
69%
Braga A
2 - 1 W
69%
Stuttgart H
2 - 0 W
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Porto has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.9) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Porto's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Porto averaging 1.6 and Thun averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Porto has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

Porto is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Porto emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (60.9 vs 41.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Porto

Porto

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more