Skip to content
Compare PSV vs AGF

PSV vs AGF Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare PSV vs AGF: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

PSV PSV Home Team
AGF AGF Away Team
PSV
80.0
W D W W W L L W W W

Last 10 Matches

AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Categories Won

12

PSV

1

Draw

2

AGF

Performance Radar

PSV
AGF

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
70%

7W, 1D, 2L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
2.9

29 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+13

+13

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Pepi (7 goals)
T. Bech (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 17
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
78.6

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 61.8

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
100%

2W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
3.64

Actual: 2.9 | Diff: -0.74

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
80.0

Attack: 100, Defense: 60.0, Form: 90.0

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

2
4

31-45'

2
7

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

2
9

76-90+'

2
PSV
AGF
PSV

Power Rating Breakdown

80.0

Overall

Attack 100
Defense 60.0
Form 90.0
Consistency 53.2
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

61.8 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 0%
PSV logo PSV
W
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Ajax (67%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
W
Sparta (49%)
W
Utrecht (70%)
L
Telstar (69%)
L
NEC (64%)
W
AZ (67%)
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Go Ahead A
4 - 1 W
70%
Ajax A
2 - 2 D
67%
Zwolle H
6 - 1 W
54%
Sparta A
2 - 0 W
49%
Utrecht H
4 - 3 W
70%
Telstar A
1 - 3 L
69%
NEC H
2 - 3 L
64%
AZ H
2 - 1 W
67%
Heracles A
3 - 1 W
41%
Heerenveen H
3 - 1 W
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

PSV has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 78.6) compared to AGF (SoS: 52.4). This means PSV's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

PSV's attack is on another level, averaging 2.9 goals per match with R. Pepi leading the charge with 7 goals. AGF manages just 1.2 per match.

Defensively, AGF is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while PSV leaks 1.6 per match.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors PSV, who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

PSV is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

PSV emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (80.0 vs 52.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

PSV

PSV

VS
AGF

AGF

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more