Compare Radnički Niš vs Genk

Radnički Niš vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Radnički Niš vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Radnički Niš Home Team

Genk Away Team

Radnički Niš

36.1

W W L W D L L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

Radnički Niš

Draw

Genk

Performance Radar

Radnički Niš

Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

A. Shestyuk (5 goals)

A. Bibout (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

36.1

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 27.2

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Radnički Niš

Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 33.2

Defense 42.3

Form 27.2

Consistency 49.3

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

53.2 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Radnički Niš

Genk

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Mladost Lučani H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 0 W

48%

Napredak A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 0 W

34%

FK IMT A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

63%

Javor H

Serbian Super Liga

3 - 2 W

52%

Radnički Krag A

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 1 D

57%

Vojvodina A

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 3 L

68%

OFK H

Serbian Super Liga

1 - 2 L

53%

Red Star A

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

74%

Spartak H

Serbian Super Liga

0 - 2 L

28%

Radnik A

Serbian Super Liga

2 - 2 D

55%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Genk has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.0) compared to Radnički Niš (SoS: 40.6). This means Genk's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Radnički Niš's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Radnički Niš conceding 1.6 and Genk conceding 1.6 per match.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Genk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Radnički Niš

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair